Advertisement

2 Responses

  1. Kathy
    Kathy March 25, 2010 at 9:26 am | | Reply

    Amy, totally unrelated note but way to go! on being featured in the New York Times today! What a wonderful surprise!

    Here’s a link for others:

    “Social Networks a Lifeline for the Chronically Ill”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/technology/25disable.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

  2. Scott K. Johnson
    Scott K. Johnson April 6, 2010 at 10:22 pm | | Reply

    You know, it’s interesting to me to see that there are few comments for this post! It is people like Peter who help “demystify” why the devices we live with day to day are designed the way they are.

    Why aren’t we, as patients who live with these devices, more interested in some of the high level “stuff” that goes on to help make devices more attractive to the people who actually wear them every single hour of every single day. Even though Peter says he does not focus so much on the patient side of things, it all trickles down.

    Are we just accustomed to getting stuck with stuff and working our lives around the medical devices?

Leave a Reply