<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Hollywood Kills Diabetes Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html</link>
	<description>A gold mine of straight talk and encouragement for people living with diabetes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-545565</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-545565</guid>
		<description>I actually chose NOT to have children because of my Type 1 diabetes, but not because I saw this movie or believe that  the portrayal of Type 1 diabetes in it is an accurate assessment of what one can expect with it. Type 1 diabetes runs in my family; my father inadvertently passed down the illness to me (though not to my sister) and I did not want to do the same thing to another generation. In addition, by the time I finally found Mr. Right (at age 35), I was already on enough medications to try to prevent some of the long term complications that arise with it. I&#039;d already had retinopathy and some reduced kidney function, despite having a HA1c of 6.2. Some of the meds I&#039;m on clearly state that pregnant women should not take them. So when a third issue came up, something that almost all of the women in my famiy have to deal with by their early 40&#039;s (massive fibroid tumors and 4-month-long periods), I knew what had to be done. After the hysterectomy, I at least have the peace of mind knowing that the Type 1 diabetes in our family will die with me. We&#039;ve had my nieces in for screening - neither of them have the genetic markers for the illness that I do. I suppose that those commenters who have had successful pregnancies might accuse me of playing God, choosing not to take ANY chance of passing those markers on to an unsuspecting kid. But I just can&#039;t see going forward with a pregnancy, given my age and my level of complications, and with a family history of an incurable illness that renders a sufferer a second-class citizen with regard to insurance eligibility and with employment, at least in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually chose NOT to have children because of my Type 1 diabetes, but not because I saw this movie or believe that  the portrayal of Type 1 diabetes in it is an accurate assessment of what one can expect with it. Type 1 diabetes runs in my family; my father inadvertently passed down the illness to me (though not to my sister) and I did not want to do the same thing to another generation. In addition, by the time I finally found Mr. Right (at age 35), I was already on enough medications to try to prevent some of the long term complications that arise with it. I&#8217;d already had retinopathy and some reduced kidney function, despite having a HA1c of 6.2. Some of the meds I&#8217;m on clearly state that pregnant women should not take them. So when a third issue came up, something that almost all of the women in my famiy have to deal with by their early 40&#8242;s (massive fibroid tumors and 4-month-long periods), I knew what had to be done. After the hysterectomy, I at least have the peace of mind knowing that the Type 1 diabetes in our family will die with me. We&#8217;ve had my nieces in for screening &#8211; neither of them have the genetic markers for the illness that I do. I suppose that those commenters who have had successful pregnancies might accuse me of playing God, choosing not to take ANY chance of passing those markers on to an unsuspecting kid. But I just can&#8217;t see going forward with a pregnancy, given my age and my level of complications, and with a family history of an incurable illness that renders a sufferer a second-class citizen with regard to insurance eligibility and with employment, at least in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-529757</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 02:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-529757</guid>
		<description>I am not diabetic but was waiting for a liver transplant when I first saw this movie. I was 12/13 years old then. It did scare me a little about her having a transplant and dying but I didn&#039;t dwell on it because I knew without the transplant I would die.

But, people have the same misconceptions about transplants too.

Thank you for writing this and educating people out there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not diabetic but was waiting for a liver transplant when I first saw this movie. I was 12/13 years old then. It did scare me a little about her having a transplant and dying but I didn&#8217;t dwell on it because I knew without the transplant I would die.</p>
<p>But, people have the same misconceptions about transplants too.</p>
<p>Thank you for writing this and educating people out there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollywood kills &#124; ValBook</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-529104</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollywood kills &#124; ValBook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 18:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-529104</guid>
		<description>[...] &#187; How Hollywood Kills Diabetes Education &#8211; DiabetesMine: the all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#187; How Hollywood Kills Diabetes Education &#8211; DiabetesMine: the all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candi</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-521778</link>
		<dc:creator>Candi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-521778</guid>
		<description>My first exposure to diabetes was the character Stacey in The BabySitters Club books. I was so intrigued that I did a report on diabetes in sixth grade. (Ironically enough, the same year the movie came out.) I still find it fascinating for some reason, and over the years, I&#039;ve kept an eye on advances and news concerning diabetes.

When I saw Steel Magnolias over ten years later, I realized that Shelby&#039;s case must be very unusual and hard to manage. What she experiences is not typical for many, and adds to the drama and pain. The most ridiculous part that I found wasn&#039;t the depiction of diabetes, but the fact that Shelby and her husband were not allowed to adopt -at all- because of her medical history. They weren&#039;t even given a chance. (There is a reason so many people go overseas to adopt. The regulations in this country are just absurd.)

Dr. Dyer, I greatly appreciate your efforts to educate the public as to diabetes.

Yes, there&#039;s a &#039;but&#039;.

I would kindly suggest that, before posting or submitting an article, you have someone you trust review it. Someone who is willing to criticize, explain, and help. Many of the previous comments about your article do highlight weaknesses in the article structure and the details it covers.

Thank you for listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first exposure to diabetes was the character Stacey in The BabySitters Club books. I was so intrigued that I did a report on diabetes in sixth grade. (Ironically enough, the same year the movie came out.) I still find it fascinating for some reason, and over the years, I&#8217;ve kept an eye on advances and news concerning diabetes.</p>
<p>When I saw Steel Magnolias over ten years later, I realized that Shelby&#8217;s case must be very unusual and hard to manage. What she experiences is not typical for many, and adds to the drama and pain. The most ridiculous part that I found wasn&#8217;t the depiction of diabetes, but the fact that Shelby and her husband were not allowed to adopt -at all- because of her medical history. They weren&#8217;t even given a chance. (There is a reason so many people go overseas to adopt. The regulations in this country are just absurd.)</p>
<p>Dr. Dyer, I greatly appreciate your efforts to educate the public as to diabetes.</p>
<p>Yes, there&#8217;s a &#8216;but&#8217;.</p>
<p>I would kindly suggest that, before posting or submitting an article, you have someone you trust review it. Someone who is willing to criticize, explain, and help. Many of the previous comments about your article do highlight weaknesses in the article structure and the details it covers.</p>
<p>Thank you for listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HM</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-521295</link>
		<dc:creator>HM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-521295</guid>
		<description>I have to side with Hollywood on this one.  As the author of this article clearly points out, monitoring tools were limited or non-existent in the 80s, yet she criticizes the movie for not promoting tools that didn&#039;t exist yet.  That&#039;s ridiculous.  The movie was also based on true events.  While Hollywood will always err on the side of drama, I&#039;m sure the movie did more good than bad in educating viewers about the seriousness of diabetes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to side with Hollywood on this one.  As the author of this article clearly points out, monitoring tools were limited or non-existent in the 80s, yet she criticizes the movie for not promoting tools that didn&#8217;t exist yet.  That&#8217;s ridiculous.  The movie was also based on true events.  While Hollywood will always err on the side of drama, I&#8217;m sure the movie did more good than bad in educating viewers about the seriousness of diabetes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-519757</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 06:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-519757</guid>
		<description>To read the comments, is to realise how much the author did write, but also how much the author needed to write, about the diabetes, and the portrayal within in film. 

I one of a long line of diabetics, who has seen grandmother in and out of the hospital at a time before there was the measurements and controls there are now; as well as watching my mother destroy her ability to make insulin because of the early drugs that caused that destruction, to watching her, receive no treatment at the hands of a callous doctor, his beliefs that old people don&#039;t matter, and turning her treatment around because I am bull-headed and know more can be done. Still, that was not enough. 

I can relate just how horrible a hypoglycaemic episode is as I have some dramatic and terrible times where I thought I could manage, but for those seemingly unending 15 minutes to half hour, I was not sure I would ever stop shaking, and feel normal again. I do make some of my insulin, and have an insulin pump--which is a revelation in caring for myself. Still I have glaucoma and neuropathy, and, like most diabetics, face the real possibility that it will be kidney failure that will eventually get me. All that damage to the nerves takes its toll. 

A quick search on the internet for gestational diabetes will reveal much about the temporary condition that can come to some mothers. I would think, but do not know, keeping one&#039;s blood sugar at fairly steady levels, when some part of your body is working against you, can&#039;t be easy. (When I have muscle pain, for example, my blood sugar levels run much higher than ordinary, so those episodes require more monitoring. Even banging your toe, or almost anything, can set the body into attempting to compensate, so that just adds more burden to the system; I have crashed from some events, but was near my desired normal, so there was little leeway for error; or the liver has decided to dump sugar into the system).)

I will say that the film does present a simplistic view of diabetes and its dimensions and its complications. 

Even the author of the article leaves much &quot;in fill&quot; explanations fall far short of presenting a reasonable &quot;why&quot; for the film&#039;s shortcoming in presenting the true nature of Shelby&#039;s condition, so it could be understood by an audience. 

Yes, one does get a hint that something is changing when one begins to crash. One can also get a sense when the blood glucose it rising. I think it would have been helpful to have mentioned neuropathy, at least.... 

Drama or not, I have found that reality is often much more dramatic than theatrical drama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To read the comments, is to realise how much the author did write, but also how much the author needed to write, about the diabetes, and the portrayal within in film. </p>
<p>I one of a long line of diabetics, who has seen grandmother in and out of the hospital at a time before there was the measurements and controls there are now; as well as watching my mother destroy her ability to make insulin because of the early drugs that caused that destruction, to watching her, receive no treatment at the hands of a callous doctor, his beliefs that old people don&#8217;t matter, and turning her treatment around because I am bull-headed and know more can be done. Still, that was not enough. </p>
<p>I can relate just how horrible a hypoglycaemic episode is as I have some dramatic and terrible times where I thought I could manage, but for those seemingly unending 15 minutes to half hour, I was not sure I would ever stop shaking, and feel normal again. I do make some of my insulin, and have an insulin pump&#8211;which is a revelation in caring for myself. Still I have glaucoma and neuropathy, and, like most diabetics, face the real possibility that it will be kidney failure that will eventually get me. All that damage to the nerves takes its toll. </p>
<p>A quick search on the internet for gestational diabetes will reveal much about the temporary condition that can come to some mothers. I would think, but do not know, keeping one&#8217;s blood sugar at fairly steady levels, when some part of your body is working against you, can&#8217;t be easy. (When I have muscle pain, for example, my blood sugar levels run much higher than ordinary, so those episodes require more monitoring. Even banging your toe, or almost anything, can set the body into attempting to compensate, so that just adds more burden to the system; I have crashed from some events, but was near my desired normal, so there was little leeway for error; or the liver has decided to dump sugar into the system).)</p>
<p>I will say that the film does present a simplistic view of diabetes and its dimensions and its complications. </p>
<p>Even the author of the article leaves much &#8220;in fill&#8221; explanations fall far short of presenting a reasonable &#8220;why&#8221; for the film&#8217;s shortcoming in presenting the true nature of Shelby&#8217;s condition, so it could be understood by an audience. </p>
<p>Yes, one does get a hint that something is changing when one begins to crash. One can also get a sense when the blood glucose it rising. I think it would have been helpful to have mentioned neuropathy, at least&#8230;. </p>
<p>Drama or not, I have found that reality is often much more dramatic than theatrical drama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Persephone</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-519671</link>
		<dc:creator>Persephone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-519671</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I thought this article was poorly written. I was eager to track down someone who could explain exactly why her diabetes was so unmanageable or why pregnancy may possibly cause complications more so than other times. Neither question was answered, and your points make no sense. You say it&#039;s misleading and out-of-date, but being out of date does not make it less true for the time. Also, I am unconvinced it is misleading since you said &quot;Women with diabetes have healthy pregnancies and health babies every day.&quot; This was mentioned in the film with the lines &quot;Diabetics have healthy babies all the time&quot; and &quot;But you are special, Shelby. There are limits to what you can do.&quot; That implies that she has some complications/condition more serious. I would like to have heard some possible conjecture as to what that is. And, diabetics do die from the condition. Just because it&#039;s not a nice fact, it&#039;s true. For people posting to say they hate this movie because of its portrayal of diabetics does not change the true seriousness of your disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I thought this article was poorly written. I was eager to track down someone who could explain exactly why her diabetes was so unmanageable or why pregnancy may possibly cause complications more so than other times. Neither question was answered, and your points make no sense. You say it&#8217;s misleading and out-of-date, but being out of date does not make it less true for the time. Also, I am unconvinced it is misleading since you said &#8220;Women with diabetes have healthy pregnancies and health babies every day.&#8221; This was mentioned in the film with the lines &#8220;Diabetics have healthy babies all the time&#8221; and &#8220;But you are special, Shelby. There are limits to what you can do.&#8221; That implies that she has some complications/condition more serious. I would like to have heard some possible conjecture as to what that is. And, diabetics do die from the condition. Just because it&#8217;s not a nice fact, it&#8217;s true. For people posting to say they hate this movie because of its portrayal of diabetics does not change the true seriousness of your disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-516636</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 13:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-516636</guid>
		<description>This is an article I found about the author&#039;s sister. http://www.cpmag.org/article.php?articleid=157&amp;cmonth=9&amp;cyear=2007

It mentions that she did, in fact, die after a kidney transplant but it also says that some aspects of her story were &quot;exaggerated&quot; in the play/movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an article I found about the author&#8217;s sister. <a href="http://www.cpmag.org/article.php?articleid=157&#038;cmonth=9&#038;cyear=2007" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpmag.org/article.php?articleid=157&#038;cmonth=9&#038;cyear=2007</a></p>
<p>It mentions that she did, in fact, die after a kidney transplant but it also says that some aspects of her story were &#8220;exaggerated&#8221; in the play/movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-455207</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-455207</guid>
		<description>To be fair to this movie, it must be remembered (as several comments have poined out) that the author based his story on his sister&#039;s real-life experiences, and with the grief of her loss still very much on his heart.
Although the movie came out in 1989, the play was written still earlier and the real-life experiences much earlier than that.  I have no doubt that the experience of the woman on whom the character of Shelby is based were as emotionally wrenching as portrayed.  

The woman on whom &quot;Shelby&quot; is based undoubtedly did not have the kind of care that is standard now; much of it simply didn&#039;t exist back then.  Still, even with monitoring, hypoglycemic episodes and insulin shock are a constant possibility (my mom&#039;s SO has had several such incidents, some requiring hospitalization, in spite of twice-daily meaurements).  

This article&#039;s last line says it all.  This is a comedy-drama about six friends, one of who _happens_ to have type-1 diabetes, and not a documentary about diabetes and how to treat it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair to this movie, it must be remembered (as several comments have poined out) that the author based his story on his sister&#8217;s real-life experiences, and with the grief of her loss still very much on his heart.<br />
Although the movie came out in 1989, the play was written still earlier and the real-life experiences much earlier than that.  I have no doubt that the experience of the woman on whom the character of Shelby is based were as emotionally wrenching as portrayed.  </p>
<p>The woman on whom &#8220;Shelby&#8221; is based undoubtedly did not have the kind of care that is standard now; much of it simply didn&#8217;t exist back then.  Still, even with monitoring, hypoglycemic episodes and insulin shock are a constant possibility (my mom&#8217;s SO has had several such incidents, some requiring hospitalization, in spite of twice-daily meaurements).  </p>
<p>This article&#8217;s last line says it all.  This is a comedy-drama about six friends, one of who _happens_ to have type-1 diabetes, and not a documentary about diabetes and how to treat it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeline</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2009/08/how-hollywood-kills-diabetes-education.html/comment-page-1#comment-449876</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=8940#comment-449876</guid>
		<description>I first saw Steel Magnolias as a young child, and was always so confused as to why Shelby started convulsing at the salon, and why she died after having a child.  Now as a graduate nutrition student, I understand how T1DM affects the body.  Obviously Hollywood exaggerates health conditions in movies, but it may serve a purpose besides adding drama.  A person who is unfamiliar with the disease may watch the film and begin to pick up on some of the basics: 1- Hypoglycemia needs quick source of sugar to raise blood glucose (orange juice in the film) 2 - Poor control can lead to kidney problems. 

For the most part, Shelby&#039;s diabetes isn&#039;t the major focus of the movie.  It is mostly a light-hearted drama about funny southern women who find strength in eachother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first saw Steel Magnolias as a young child, and was always so confused as to why Shelby started convulsing at the salon, and why she died after having a child.  Now as a graduate nutrition student, I understand how T1DM affects the body.  Obviously Hollywood exaggerates health conditions in movies, but it may serve a purpose besides adding drama.  A person who is unfamiliar with the disease may watch the film and begin to pick up on some of the basics: 1- Hypoglycemia needs quick source of sugar to raise blood glucose (orange juice in the film) 2 &#8211; Poor control can lead to kidney problems. </p>
<p>For the most part, Shelby&#8217;s diabetes isn&#8217;t the major focus of the movie.  It is mostly a light-hearted drama about funny southern women who find strength in eachother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

