The true nature of the relationship from a more objective standpoint is obviously more complex, but that’s how it *feels*. I’m someone who’s often driven more by how I feel than logic and fact (it’s an admitted character flaw) so it’s kind of hard to not feel a little bitter. In light of my perception of the relationship, as skewed as that view might be, I think it’s OK for us to ‘dine on their dime’. I can’t speak for the rest of the D-community, but they can’t buy me because they’ve already drained my pockets and to some extent, my morale.

I hope the summit and anything that comes of it ultimately empowers us rather than continues this feeling of being at their mercy (I’m fairly certain I’m not alone in feeling that we are), and that right there feels like a good reason to participate. We need a paradigm shift, and I hope this sparks one. Since they have the resources to get it started, I hope we can take advantage of the opportunity.

And your right, it is “both a “fine line/and a symbiotic relationship between patient bloggers and Pharma companies.” I feel that if Pharma is willing to dialogue and listen to what real patients have to say – be it positive or negative, substantial changes can be made to benefit the patient in the long run.

As a consumer, a patient and Patient Blogger, I respect any company who listens to what their customers/patients wants and needs are, and are also willing to hear and acknowledge both the patients likes AND dislikes.

I think it’s commendable that Roche took the Social Media initiative by the horns and am very much looking forward to the next few days of discussions!
Kelly K