<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diabetes Tech Society Update: Acceleration? Maybe&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diabetesmine.com/2008/11/diabetes-tech-society-update-acceleration-maybe.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2008/11/diabetes-tech-society-update-acceleration-maybe.html</link>
	<description>A gold mine of straight talk and encouragement for people living with diabetes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonlurkermom</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2008/11/diabetes-tech-society-update-acceleration-maybe.html/comment-page-1#comment-141856</link>
		<dc:creator>anonlurkermom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=5217#comment-141856</guid>
		<description>Please let everyone know that you can donate to JDRF and designate that your contribution be used for artificial pancreas research.  This is helpful for those of us with type 1 who are opposed to stem cell research.  the artificial pancreas project is more realistic than a cure in &quot;our lifetime&quot;.  I gave up giving to JDRF until I realized this is an option to reconcile beliefs with real concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please let everyone know that you can donate to JDRF and designate that your contribution be used for artificial pancreas research.  This is helpful for those of us with type 1 who are opposed to stem cell research.  the artificial pancreas project is more realistic than a cure in &#8220;our lifetime&#8221;.  I gave up giving to JDRF until I realized this is an option to reconcile beliefs with real concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmyT</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2008/11/diabetes-tech-society-update-acceleration-maybe.html/comment-page-1#comment-141340</link>
		<dc:creator>AmyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=5217#comment-141340</guid>
		<description>Good for you, Pubsgal!  Unfortunately, the reality is that there are many patients who are not as informed / conscientious about using their meters to actually impact their health.  Grrr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for you, Pubsgal!  Unfortunately, the reality is that there are many patients who are not as informed / conscientious about using their meters to actually impact their health.  Grrr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pubsgal</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2008/11/diabetes-tech-society-update-acceleration-maybe.html/comment-page-1#comment-141192</link>
		<dc:creator>Pubsgal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=5217#comment-141192</guid>
		<description>I just went and read the article referenced in the &quot;calling into question the value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for Type 2 diabetics.&quot;  Grrr...they&#039;d have to pry my meter out of my cold, dead hands.  There is absolutely NO WAY I could have gotten my blood glucose levels to the desired levels as quickly by only checking via a1C every 3 months.  My meter readings have been crucial for such things as determining whether I would successfully manage by diet and exercise or not (and making diet adjustments) and in figuring how much metformin to use (and whether it was having an impact).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went and read the article referenced in the &#8220;calling into question the value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for Type 2 diabetics.&#8221;  Grrr&#8230;they&#8217;d have to pry my meter out of my cold, dead hands.  There is absolutely NO WAY I could have gotten my blood glucose levels to the desired levels as quickly by only checking via a1C every 3 months.  My meter readings have been crucial for such things as determining whether I would successfully manage by diet and exercise or not (and making diet adjustments) and in figuring how much metformin to use (and whether it was having an impact).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2008/11/diabetes-tech-society-update-acceleration-maybe.html/comment-page-1#comment-141186</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=5217#comment-141186</guid>
		<description>CGM is a crucial, crucial hurdle that makes closed loop an actual possibility versus pie in the sky. Still very long-term I guess.  
 I&#039;m very interested in the immediate question of how soon non-Minimed pump manufacturers will integrate CGM.  I recently tried CGM and it reversed my skepticism regarding its value.  I discovered that CGM accuracy compared to finger sticks is really not an issue.   I was very surprised by how comforting it was to know what direction my bg was going and it added greatly to my daily peace of mind.  I spend so much of my life feeling like I can&#039;t depend on feeling well, you know, like when is the bottom going to fall out?   I&#039;d rather have CGM than a pump.  I suspect the pump companies are fast tracking projects to integrate CGM but not a word has come out publicly so far as I&#039;ve seen.   CGM has a learning curve but once large #s of people try it, I think any company that does not offer CGMS integrated into one piece of hardware will lose lots of market share.  I&#039;m hopeful that the the pump market will really change in just a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CGM is a crucial, crucial hurdle that makes closed loop an actual possibility versus pie in the sky. Still very long-term I guess.<br />
 I&#8217;m very interested in the immediate question of how soon non-Minimed pump manufacturers will integrate CGM.  I recently tried CGM and it reversed my skepticism regarding its value.  I discovered that CGM accuracy compared to finger sticks is really not an issue.   I was very surprised by how comforting it was to know what direction my bg was going and it added greatly to my daily peace of mind.  I spend so much of my life feeling like I can&#8217;t depend on feeling well, you know, like when is the bottom going to fall out?   I&#8217;d rather have CGM than a pump.  I suspect the pump companies are fast tracking projects to integrate CGM but not a word has come out publicly so far as I&#8217;ve seen.   CGM has a learning curve but once large #s of people try it, I think any company that does not offer CGMS integrated into one piece of hardware will lose lots of market share.  I&#8217;m hopeful that the the pump market will really change in just a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diabetes Tech Society Update: Acceleration? Maybe… &#124; Pro Health News</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetesmine.com/2008/11/diabetes-tech-society-update-acceleration-maybe.html/comment-page-1#comment-140944</link>
		<dc:creator>Diabetes Tech Society Update: Acceleration? Maybe… &#124; Pro Health News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diabetesmine.com/?p=5217#comment-140944</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: Diabetes Tech Society Update: Acceleration? Maybe… &#160;Mail this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here: Diabetes Tech Society Update: Acceleration? Maybe… &nbsp;Mail this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
